As any dog owner will tell you, the picture to the left is of an unfortunate necessity if you're ever planning on taking Rags out of the house.
I refer of course to poop bags.
Now, this isn't the first time I've mentioned poop bags. I also alluded to them in this post.
But it's time to, um, dig deep and discuss them in more detail.
If you know anything about me - and really, can anyone know anything about anyone? - you know I'm not a perfume-y kind of guy. I use unscented deodorant. My clothes are washed in unscented Tide detergent. And I don't ever wear men's cologne, at least not since Calvin Klein One went to $69 an ounce (Purity. Unity. Sensuality.).
But I believe if there's one thing that should be strongly scented, it's poop bags. Granted, no matter what bag you use it's a losing battle. Even the unscented bags wind up with a scent, although it's definitely not the scent of choice. And the scented ones always wind up giving up the fight because they aren't scented enough to completely cover the scent they need to.
But at least they try. I file it - figuratively - under "better than nothing."
We can put a man on the moon, the government can listen to every call ever made and I can turn a Zip Lock bag upside down and nothing spills out. Is it too much to ask for a poop bag to completely mask the unpleasant fragrance of a healthy diet and a job well done?
It's my hope somewhere scientists are working on this.
And without getting too detailed, while they're at it, if they could look into shaping the bags like gloves it would make doing our, um, duty as owners a lot easier.
1 comment:
While I agree the duty can get noxious, I have no interest in a chemical scent to overcome it. I just hold the bag farther away from me and hope we come across a garbage can soon.
Post a Comment