So just gaze at the picture and enjoy while I talk about my perforated septum. As I've mentioned before here, I basically have a hole in my nose between airways that needs to get repaired.
When dealing with medical issues of any kind, especially those involving a potential surgery - major or minor - I always make it a point to find "the guy." In this case, "the guy" is the Chief of Surgery at the world-renown, major metropolitan hospital where I live. He's responsible for all the surgeries in all the specialties. And, come to find out, his specialty is Ear Nose and Throat. He was also Chief of Surgery for that particular department for six years.
Let's say confidence is high he can get the job done,
I met with him last Friday, and we discussed how he might go about performing the surgery. One way, and the way I prefer by far, is closed surgery where he just works through the nasal passages with really small instruments and precision to repair the perforation. The other far less preferable way is open surgery, where he makes a small incision in the center of my nose, then pulls it back revealing the septum more fully. It gives him a better view, and more room to move. And it only leaves a small incision when he's done that eventually heals to be unnoticeable.
See why I went with the picture of the earthrise?
Basically he has to graft a material over the hole in my septum. As we spoke about it, he told me he was going to talk to reps about which materials had the best take rate, that is the percentage of times the material is successfully grafted and holds. There's always the chance it won't take, which would just put me back where I started.
Afterwards, I started thinking about different take rates in advertising. Like the take rate of creative directors who don't want to get their fingerprints all over every idea presented to them (low). The take rate of clients buying the work unchanged (low). The take rate of planners not giving some asinine insight they think is brilliant, like "the consumer wants a better experience to engage with and advocate for."
Yeah. That's just what they want (lower than low).
I was also thinking about the take rate for people remembering this post after they read it. My take was I probably shouldn't think about that.
2 comments:
The term "take rate" is new to me, Dude. I've never heard a term like that articulated. Plus, it's been a while since I've worked in an environment where I've had to deal with "The Moron Review Board," which is what we're really talking about. "Take Rate" is the diplomatic term. My doctors always talk about their "success rate," which I'm OK with, since the resulting level of pain and incapacity is usually the best indicator of their "success." At any rate, as a surviving veteran of some of the medical profession's little "fixits" (cataracts, shoulder joint replacement etc.) I can only wish you well and hope that your "take rate" is more like 100 per cent.
Thanks Mike.
Post a Comment